[Features]

2015 300cc Enduro Shootout: Extras

9 years ago | Words: Andy Wigan | Photos: Andy Wigan

So by now, you would have checked out Transmoto‘s 2015 300cc Enduro Bike Shootout that appears in our 2014 November-December (#47) issue. Here’s an insight into how our testing system works, and a little bit more information about the Beta, Sherco and KTM, that we couldn’t quite squeeze into the magazine.

SCORING & RANKING

The way test bikes are scored and ranked in shootouts will always be a contentious one, and – surprise, surprise – you never get consensus from all manufacturers over the methodology. But, after staging shootouts for 15 years, we’re confident that the way we go about it produces the most accurate and relevant feedback. In broad terms, here’s how it works:

  • Testers fill out a detailed scorecard for each bike. That is then distilled into a score out of 10 for engine, suspension/steering and ergos/brakes. They do this alone to ensure their feedback in not influenced by other test riders.
  • When test riders submit their scores, they are aggregated and subjected to a weighted average – 50% for engine, 40% for suspension/steering and 10% for ergos/brakes.
  • We then sit down for a two-hour feedback session after the track testing to add dimension and detail to those scores. Here, the objective is to determine what sort of rider, terrain and riding style each bike best suits.

Why apply a weighted average to the scores? A few reasons:

  • Because low scores for ergos (such as a too-soft seat or unconventional bar bend) are easy and relatively cheap to fix. Low scores for engine and suspension, on the other hand (poor throttle response at low revs or a deflecting fork, for example), are not only much costlier fixes; they also have a larger impact on the bike’s performance (and/or lap time potential).
  • If we didn’t apply a weighted average, it could create misleading results. Let’s say Bike A scores 9 for engine, 9 for suspension and 6 for ergos. Bike B scores a 6 for engine, 9 for suspension and 9 for ergos. Both bikes’ total score adds up to 24, or an average of 8 out of 10. In which case, their overall raw scores would be identical. But which bike would you rather buy? Naturally, Bike A – because for some added seat foam and a $100 handlebar with a better bend, you’ll be way ahead of the bloke who bought Bike B and then had to spend $1000 on a pipe, cam and/or head porting to bolster its engine performance from a 6 to a 9 out of 10.

JETTING SPECS

47_300_FuelEconomy-Jetting Sheet1

Be the first to comment...

You might also like...

1 month ago

BAJA 1000: ‘BEYOND THE LINE’

‘Beyond the Line’: a cool, bite-sized insight to the iconic annual Baja 1000 race.

1 month ago

HOW-TO: REPLACE YOUR GRAPHICS – PROPERLY!

The six key steps involved in replacing your bike’s old, worn graphics.

1 month ago

GIFT A MATE – AMA SUPERMOTOCROSS VIDEO PASS

Buy your mate an exclusive ticket to watching AMA SX outside of the USA.

1 month ago

HOW-TO: CHAIN & SPROCKET REPLACEMENT

We walk you through the 10 key steps that’ll ensure your bike’s chain and sprocket are doing their job properly.

Royal Enfield

2 months ago

ROYAL ENFIELD’S HIMALAYAN 450 – FAQS ANSWERED

We answer your most FAQs about Royal Enfield’s landmark new Himalayan 450 adventure tourer.

2 months ago

HOW-TO: HANDLEBAR CONTROLS SET-UP

Eight simple steps to help you declutter, service and update your bike’s handlebar-mounted controls.

2 months ago

HOW-TO: FOOT-CONTROL SET-UP

Five simple steps to help you get your footpegs, rear brake pedal and gear-shift lever properly adjusted.

2 months ago

Harry Norton Takes the Helm at Red Bull KTM Factory Racing

Aussie Harry Norton has taken the step into the role as Team Manager of the Red Bull KTM race team.